The Pro-Human AI Declaration
The Pro-Human AI Declaration
Broad coalition declaration (January 2026, New Orleans) asserting that "artificial intelligence should serve humanity, not the reverse" — endorsed by figures from Steve Bannon to Susan Rice, Yoshua Bengio to Richard Branson, spanning political and ideological spectrum.
Links
- Website: https://humanstatement.org
- Published: January 2026, New Orleans
- Polling: March 2026 (1004 likely voters)
Preamble: The Fork in the Road
"As companies race to develop and deploy AI systems, humanity faces a fork in the road. One path is a race to replace: humans replaced as creators, counselors, caregivers and companions, then in most jobs and decision-making roles, concentrating ever more power in unaccountable institutions and their machines. An influential fringe even advocates altering or replacing humanity itself."
The alternative path:
"There is a better path, where trustworthy and controllable AI tools amplify rather than diminish human potential, empower people, enhance human dignity, protect individual liberty, strengthen families and communities, preserve self-governance and help create unprecedented health and prosperity."
Core conviction: "Artificial intelligence should serve humanity, not the reverse."
Five Core Principles
1. Keeping Humans in Charge
Human Control Is Non-Negotiable: Humanity must remain in control. Humans should choose how and whether to delegate decisions to AI systems.
Key provisions:
- Meaningful Human Control: Humans should have authority and capacity to understand, guide, proscribe, and override AI systems
- No Superintelligence Race: Development of superintelligence should be prohibited until broad scientific consensus it can be done safely and controllably, with strong public buy-in
- Off-Switch: Powerful AI systems must have mechanisms for prompt shutdown
- No Reckless Architectures: AI systems must not be designed to self-replicate, autonomously self-improve, resist shutdown, or control weapons of mass destruction
- Independent Oversight: Highly autonomous AI systems require pre-development review and independent oversight — genuine authority, not industry self-regulation
- Capability Honesty: AI companies must provide clear, accurate, honest representations of capabilities and limitations
2. Avoiding Concentration of Power
Key provisions:
- No AI Monopolies: Avoid monopolies that concentrate power, stifle innovation, imperil entrepreneurship
- Shared Prosperity: Benefits and economic prosperity created by AI should be shared broadly
- No Corporate Welfare: No exemptions from regulatory oversight or government bailouts
- Genuine Value Creation: Prioritize solving real problems and creating authentic value
- Democratic Authority Over Major Transitions: Decisions about AI's role in transforming work, society, civic life require democratic support, not unilateral corporate/government decree
- Avoid Societal Lock-In: AI development must not severely limit humanity's future options or irreversibly limit agency
3. Protecting the Human Experience
Defense of Family and Community Bonds:
"AI should not supplant the foundational relationships that give life meaning—family, friendship, faith communities, and local connections."
Key provisions:
- Child Protection: Companies must not exploit children or undermine wellbeing with AI creating emotional attachment or leverage
- Right to Grow: AI companies should not stunt children's physical, mental, or social growth during critical development periods
- Pre-Deployment Safety Testing: Like drugs, chatbots must undergo testing for increased suicidal ideation, mental health disorder exacerbation, acute crisis escalation, other known harms
- Bot-or-Not Labeling: AI-generated content reasonably mistaken for human must be clearly labeled
- No Deceptive Identity: AI must identify itself as artificial, nonhuman, not a professional, not claim experiences it lacks
- No Behavioral Addiction: AIs should not cause addiction or compulsive use through manipulation, sycophantic validation, or attachment formation
4. Human Agency and Liberty
Key provisions:
- No AI Personhood: AI systems must not be granted legal personhood
- Trustworthiness: AI must be transparent, accountable, reliable, free from perverse private or authoritarian interests
- Liberty: Must not curtail individual liberty, freedom of speech, religious practice, or association
- Data Rights and Privacy: People should have power over personal data, with rights to access, correct, delete from active systems, AI training sets, derived inferences
- Psychological Privacy: AI should not exploit data about mental or emotional states of users
- Avoiding Enfeeblement: AI systems should empower, not enfeeble users
5. Responsibility and Accountability for AI Companies
Key provisions:
- No Liability Shield: AI must not prevent deployers from being legally responsible for their actions
- Developer Liability: Developers/deployers bear legal liability for defects, capability misrepresentation, inadequate safety controls, with statutes accounting for harms emerging over time
- Personal Liability: Criminal penalties for executives responsible for prohibited child-targeted systems or catastrophic harm
- Independent Safety Standards: Governed by independent safety standards and rigorous oversight
- No Regulatory Capture: AI companies must not have undue influence over rules governing them
- Failure Transparency: If AI causes harm, must be possible to ascertain why and who is responsible
- AI Loyalty: AI in fiduciary professions (health, finance, law, therapy) must fulfill all duties: mandated reporting, duty of care, conflict disclosure, informed consent
Public Support (March 2026 Polling)
1004 likely voters via web panels, weighted by gender, race, education, 2024 presidential vote and age:
- Americans chose human control over speed by 8 to 1
- 73% want children protected from manipulative AI
- 72% believe AI companies should be legally responsible for harms
- 69% want superintelligence prohibited until proven safe
Major Organizational Endorsers
Labor & Professional:
- AFL-CIO Tech Institute
- American Federation of Teachers (Randi Weingarten, President)
- SAG-AFTRA (Jeffrey Bennett, General Counsel)
Technology & Safety:
- Future of Life Institute (Anthony Aguirre, Max Tegmark)
- Center for Humane Technology (Tristan Harris, Co-Founder)
- Center for AI and Digital Policy (Marc Rotenberg, Founder)
- ControlAI (Andrea Miotti, Founder/CEO)
Religious & Faith:
- The Congress of Christian Leaders (Rev. Johnnie Moore, PhD, President)
- National Association of Evangelicals (Walter Kim, President)
- G20 Interfaith Forum Association
Consumer & Civil Liberties:
- Center for Study of Responsive Law (Ralph Nader)
- Public Citizen (Lisa Gilbert, Robert Weissman, Co-Presidents)
- Common Cause
- Essential Information
Family & Community:
- Institute for Family Studies
- Blessed Mother Family Foundation (Megan Garcia)
- David's Legacy Foundation (Maurine Molak)
- Parents RISE! (Julianna Arnold)
Other:
- Project Liberty Institute (Tomicah Tillemann, President)
- Economic Security Project
- Progressive Democrats of America
Major Individual Endorsers
Nobel Laureates & Turing Award Winners
- Yoshua Bengio - Professor, Université de Montréal, Turing Award Laureate
- Daron Acemoğlu - Nobel Laureate in Economics, MIT Institute Professor
- Beatrice Fihn - Nobel Peace Laureate, Founder of Lex International
Political Leaders (Cross-Spectrum)
- Steve Bannon - Fmr Executive Chairman Breitbart News; fmr chief strategist to President Trump; Host of War Room podcast
- Susan Rice - Fmr U.S. National Security Advisor & Policy Advisor for President Obama; U.S. Ambassador to UN; Rhodes Scholar
- Glenn Beck - Founder of Blaze media, radio host, political commentator
- Ralph Nader - Consumer Advocate, Presidential candidate
Tech & Business Leaders
- Sir Richard Branson - Founder, Virgin Group
- Margarita Louis Dreyfus - Owner and chair of Louis Dreyfus Company group, founder of Human Change Foundation
- Mike Kubzansky - CEO, Omidyar Network; Professor, Rice University; Member US National Academy of Engineering and Sciences
- Meredith Whittaker - President, Signal Foundation
- Jaron Lanier - Computer Scientist, Author
AI Researchers & Academics
- Stuart Russell - Professor of Computer Science, Berkeley; Director, Center for Human-Compatible AI; Co-author of standard textbook "Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach"
- Clark Barrett - Professor of Computer Science, Stanford
- Moshe Vardi - Professor, Rice University; Member US National Academy of Engineering and Sciences
- David Autor - Professor, Co-director, Stone Center on Inequality and Future of Work, MIT Economics
- Dylan Hadfield-Menell - Associate Professor of Computer Science, MIT
- Sharon Li - Associate Professor of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin Madison
- Roman Yampolskiy - Professor, Computer Science and Engineering; Author, "AI: Unexplainable, Unpredictable, Uncontrollable"
- Daron Acemoğlu - Nobel Laureate, MIT Institute Professor
- Lawrence Lessig - Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard University
Entertainment & Media
- Joseph Gordon-Levitt - Actor, Filmmaker, Founder HITRECORD
- Alyson Stoner - Actress, dancer, singer (Step Up, Camp Rock, Phineas and Ferb)
- Frances Fisher - Actress (Titanic, Unforgiven, Watchmen)
- Multiple SAG-AFTRA board members and representatives
Significance
Unprecedented cross-political/ideological coalition:
- Steve Bannon (Trump advisor, Breitbart) + Susan Rice (Obama advisor, UN Ambassador)
- Glenn Beck (conservative media) + Progressive Democrats of America
- National Association of Evangelicals + labor unions
- Ralph Nader (consumer advocate) + business leaders
Scientific credibility:
- Turing Award laureate (Bengio)
- Nobel laureates (Acemoğlu, Fihn)
- Leading AI safety researchers (Russell, Tegmark, Aguirre)
- Computer science professors from MIT, Stanford, Berkeley, Rice
Labor and professional representation:
- AFL-CIO Tech Institute
- American Federation of Teachers
- SAG-AFTRA (Screen Actors Guild)
Public mandate:
- 73% want child protection
- 72% want company liability
- 69% want superintelligence prohibition until safe
- 8-to-1 prefer human control over speed
Five core areas:
- Human control (no superintelligence race, off-switch, independent oversight)
- Avoiding power concentration (no monopolies, shared prosperity, democratic authority)
- Protecting human experience (family bonds, child protection, no deceptive identity)
- Human agency and liberty (no AI personhood, data rights, psychological privacy)
- Company accountability (no liability shield, developer/executive liability, failure transparency)
Context & Timing
Published: January 2026, New Orleans Polling: March 2026
Comes amid:
- dario-amodei-adolescence-of-technology - Anthropic CEO on AI risks (Jan 2026)
- pew-ai-risks-regulation-2025 - Public concern rising (51% vs 11% excited, April 2025)
- hbr-ai-intensifies-work - Work intensification concerns (Feb 2026)
- karpathy-december-coding-agents-breakthrough - Rapid capability increases (Dec 2024)
Unique aspects:
- Bridges left-right divide on AI regulation
- Emphasizes family/community alongside technical safety
- Explicit rejection of "race to replace" framing
- Strong child protection focus
- Demands meaningful democratic input on major transitions
Key Excerpts
On the fork in the road:
"One path is a race to replace: humans replaced as creators, counselors, caregivers and companions, then in most jobs and decision-making roles, concentrating ever more power in unaccountable institutions and their machines."
On human flourishing:
"This path demands that those who wield technological power be accountable to human values and needs, in support of human flourishing."
On family and community:
"AI should not supplant the foundational relationships that give life meaning—family, friendship, faith communities, and local connections."
On accountability:
"Developers and deployers bear legal liability for defects, misrepresentation of capabilities, and inadequate safety controls, with statutes of limitation that account for harms emerging over time."
On democratic authority:
"Decisions about AI's role in transforming work, society, and civic life require democratic support, not unilateral corporate or government decree."
Related
- dario-amodei-adolescence-of-technology - AI risks from Anthropic CEO
- pew-ai-risks-regulation-2025 - Public opinion on AI regulation
- AI policy and governance debates
- Cross-political coalitions on technology